BeaverFit: Contract Access, Not Industrial Capacity
What the Department of War’s H2F award establishes about configuration control, data rights and fiscal classification
On 4 August 2026 the Army Field Directorate Office at Fort Eustis awarded BeaverFit North America LLC of Reno, Nevada, a $350,000,000 firm-fixed-price, single-award indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract, W911S0-26-D-A009, for the design and construction of Holistic Health and Fitness structures, other human performance structures, wide span structures, and human performance equipment and systems, with an estimated completion date of 4 August 2033, according to the Department of War contract announcement for 4 August 2026. Two magnitudes drawn from the same programme’s record give the ceiling its shape. The research round that produced the requirement funded seven firms with $1,271,576 in total between 2 May and 2 August 2023, according to the Small Business Administration award record. The last comparable Army purchase in this product family, a fixed-price contract for 128 shipping container gyms, was awarded at $3,794,432 in 2018, as recorded in the Government Accountability Office decision in BeaverFit North America, LLC. The structural constraint sits in one sentence of the announcement itself: work locations and funding will be determined with each order. What the award establishes, therefore, is a legal capacity to order rather than a purchase, and what it leaves open is whether the position converts into accepted industrial output.
The report proceeds in eleven sections. The first establishes what an indefinite-quantity contract obliges the Government and the contractor to do, working the deviated FAR Part 16 and the Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement. The second reconstructs Army demand from the Center for Initial Military Training’s December 2025 expansion statement, the Corps of Engineers’ Huntsville Center equipment task order and the fiscal year 2027 Other Procurement justification book. The third traces topic A234-005 through the Army SBIR topic page, the Army Applications Laboratory information sheet and the Small Business Administration award records. The fourth tests the Phase III question against the SBIR/STTR policy framework and four Government Accountability Office decisions. The fifth examines the written determination required above $150 million. The sixth works the fiscal and real-property gate through 10 U.S.C. chapter 169, the Army Standard for Soldier Performance Readiness Centers and the Department of Defense Inspector General’s audit of relocatable buildings. The seventh reads corporate structure from the Companies House register. The eighth addresses technical data under the deviated DFARS Subpart 227.71, the ninth domestic content under the deviated FAR Part 25, the tenth the competitor field, the eleventh the conditions for conversion. The report does not value the company, does not estimate revenue from the ceiling, and does not rank BeaverFit against the suppliers named in the same field.